4
a on the ground Is Campbell, the Attorney General under whose advice the prosecution was commenced had been advanced to a seat on the Bench then temporarily vacante by the suspension of the Chief Justice.
4- I cannot regard but regard this explanation as unsatisfactory, and insufficient. The charge against Marrant was that of Conspiracy against a public officer of the Govt was a very grave one. It was one which should not have been made except upon the clearest grounds. It was a charge which when so made, is less than justice to the party accused in whose name the prosecution was instituted requires to be pressed to a decision before a Judicial Tribunal. If proceedings against the accused parties for serious Offences are thus
4
5
a
on the
ground
Is Campbell, the Allenity General
under whose
advice the proscention
was cominent cò
کا
had
been advanced to a
Leat
the Bench
then tisuprecarily vacante by the suspension of the Obrez Sustice.
4-
I connet regard but regard this explanation aussatisfactory,
and
confpicient. The
Charge aganist Marrant
$
that of Conspiracy ryanid public officer of the
Goot was a sexy gravé
ont.
JA
one which should
not have been
109
made
except expon the Clearest
it was
grounds.
a
BBut
charge which
when som
so made,
pustice to the party.
accused
less than
in whose
w the Crown name the prosecution
was nstituted requnès to shouts be pressed to a decision before Iudicial Tribunal. If proceederigo agamot
a
accased.
parties grotly of
were
serious Offences are
thus
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.